References
Adler-Kassner, L. (2017). Because writing is never just writing. College Composition and Communication, 69(2), 317–340.
Adler-Kassner, L., & Wardle, E. A. (Eds.). (2015). Naming what we know: Threshold concepts of writing studies. Utah State University Press.
Alexander, J. (2008). Media convergence: Creating content, questioning relationships. Computers and Composition, 25(1), 1–8.
Alexander, J., Lunsford, K., & Whithaus, C. (2020). Toward wayfinding: A metaphor for understanding writing experiences. Written Communication, 37(1), 104–131.
Alexander, K. P., & Williams, D. M. (2015). DMAC after dark: Toward a theory of distributed invention. Computers and Composition, 36, 32–43.
Allan, Elizabeth G. (2013). Multimodal rhetorics in the disciplines: Available means of persuasion in an undergraduate architecture studio. Across the Disciplines, 10.
Anderson, D., Atkins, A., Ball, C., Millar, K. H., Selfe, C., & Selfe, R. (2006). Integrating multimodality into composition curricula: Survey methodology and results from a CCCC research grant. Composition Studies, 34(2), 59–84.
Anzaldúa, G. (1987). Borderlands/la frontera: The new mestiza (1st ed). Spinsters/Aunt Lute.
Ayash, N. B. (2019). Toward translingual realities in composition: (Re)working local language representations and practices. Utah State University Press.
Ayash, N. B. (2020). Critical translation and paratextuality: Translingual and anti-racist pedagogical possibilities for multilingual writers. Composition Forum, 44.
Baalbaki, R., Fakhreddine, J., Khoury, M., & Riman, S. (2020). Arabic, as home language, acts as a resource in an English class: Borrowing translation strategies in a First Year Writing course. In A. Frost, J. Kiernan, & S. Blum-Malley (Eds.), Translingual dispositions: Globalized approaches to the teaching of writing (pp. 225–248). The WAC Clearinghouse ; University Press of Colorado.
Baca, D. (2008). Mestiz@ scripts, digital migrations and the territories of writing (1st ed). Palgrave Macmillan.
Ball, C. E., & Charlton, C. (2015). All writing is multimodal. In L. Adler-Kassner & E. A. Wardle (Eds.), Naming what we know: Threshold concepts of writing studies (p. 42). Utah State University Press.
Banks, A. J. (2006). Race, rhetoric, and technology: Searching for higher ground. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Banks, A. J. (2011). Digital griots: African American rhetoric in a multimedia age. Conference on College Composition and Communication of the National Council of Teachers of English.
Banks, A. J. (2016). Dominant genre emeritus: Why it’s time to retire the essay. CLA Journal, 60(2), 179–190.
Barad, K. M. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
Bastian, H. (2017). Student affective responses to “bringing the funk” in the first-year writing classroom. College Composition and Communication, 69(1), 6–34.
Batova, T., & Clark, D. (2015). The complexities of globalized content management. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 29(2), 221–235.
Bawarshi, A. (2016). Beyond the genre fixation: A translingual perspective on genre. College English, 78(3), 243–249.
Bawarshi, A. S., & Reiff, M. J. (2010). Genre: An introduction to history, theory, research, and pedagogy. Parlor Press ; WAC Clearinghouse.
Bazerman, C. (1981). What written knowledge does: Three examples of academic discourse. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11(3), 361–387.
Bazerman, C. (1994). Systems of genre and the enactment of social intentions. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 67–86). Taylor & Francis.
Bazerman, C. (2004). Intertextuality: How texts rely on other texts. In C. Bazerman & P. A. Prior (Eds.), What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices (pp. 83–96). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bazerman, C., Applebee, A. N., Berninger, V. W., Brandt, D., Graham, S., Jeffery, J., Matsuda, P. K., Murphy, S., Rowe, D. W., Schleppegrell, M., & Wilcox, K. C. (Eds.). (2018). The lifespan development of writing. National Council of Teachers of English.
Bazerman, C., & Tinberg, H. (2015). Text is an object outside of oneself that can be improved and developed. In L. Adler-Kassner & E. A. Wardle (Eds.), Naming what we know: Threshold concepts of writing studies (p. 61). Utah State University Press.
Beach, K. (1999). Consequential transitions: A sociocultural expedition beyond transfer in education. Review of Research in Education, 24(1), 101–139.
Bearden, L. (2019). Favorable outcomes: How outcomes can make space for multimodal composition curricula. WPA: Writing Program Administration, 43(1), 139–160.
Beaufort, A. (2007). College writing and beyond: A new framework for university writing instruction. Utah State University Press.
Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.
Berry, P. W., Hawisher, G. E., & Selfe, C. L. (2012). Transnational literate lives in digital times. Utah State University Press : Computers and Composition Digital Press.
Berthoff, A. E. (1981). The making of meaning: Metaphors, models, and maxims for writing teachers. Boynton/Cook Publishers.
Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts: A social semiotic account of designs for learning. Written Communication, 25(2), 166–195.
Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. Routledge.
Bizzell, P. (1982). Cognition, convention, and certainty: What we need to know about writing. PRE/TEXT, 3(3), 213–243.
Bizzell, P. (1994). “Contact zones” and English studies. College English, 56(2), 163–169.
Blackmon, S., & Rose, S. K. (2005). Plug and play: Technology and mentoring teachers of writing. In S. I. Dobrin (Ed.), Don’t call it that!: The composition practicum (pp. 98–112). National Council of Teachers of English.
Blair, K. (2014). Professional development as shared responsibility: A response. The Writing Instructor.
Blakesley, D. (2017). Terministic screens. In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods (pp. 1745–1748). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Blancato, M., Johnson, G. P., Moss, B. J., & Wilder, S. (2019). The work of boundary-crossing in a community-engaged literacy course. Journal of College Literacy and Learning, 45, 95–97.
Blommaert, J. (2007). Sociolinguistic scales. Intercultural Pragmatics, 4(1), 1–19.
Bogost, I. (2007). Persuasive games: The expressive power of videogames. MIT Press.
Bolter, J. D., & Grusin, R. (2003). Remediation: Understanding new media (6. Nachdr). MIT Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In J. Karabel, & A. H. Halsey (Eds.), Power and Ideology in Education (pp. 487-511). New York: Oxford University Press.
Bourelle, T., Bourelle, A., Spong, S., Knutson, A. V., Howland-Davis, E., & Kubasek, N. (2015). Reflections in online writing instruction: Pathways to professional development. Kairos, 20(1).
Boyle, C., Vie, S., Micciche, L., Yergeau, M., Dadas, C., Morris, J., Smith, C., & Blankenship, L. (2015). e.pluribus plures: DMAC and its keywords. Computers and Composition, 36, 1–15.
Brandt, D. (2001). Literacy in American lives. Cambridge University Press.
Braun, C. C. (2014). Cultivating ecologies for digital media work: The case of English studies. Southern Illinois University Press.
Brewer, E., McCook, N., & Halasek, K. (2018). Flipping professional development. Pedagogy, 18(3), 483–509.
Bridwell-Bowles, L., Powell, K. E., & Choplin, T. W. (2009). Not just words any more: Multimodal communication across the curriculum. Across the Disciplines, 6.
Brooke, C. G. (2009). Lingua fracta: Toward a rhetoric of new media. Hampton Press.
Brown, E. D., & Conner, S. G. (2019). Forty years of resistance in TA education. WPA: Writing Program Administration, 42(3), 65–70.
Brueggemann, B. J., & Voss, J. (2013). Articulating betweenity: Literacy, language, identity, and technology in the Deaf/Hard-of-Hearing collection. In H. L. Ulman, S. L. DeWitt, & C. L. Selfe (Eds.), Stories that speak to us: Exhibits from the digital archive of literacy narratives. Utah State University Press.
Buehl, J. (2016). Assembling arguments: Multimodal rhetoric and scientific discourse. The University of South Carolina Press.
Burke, K. (1966). Language as symbolic action: Essays on life, literature, and method. University of California Press.
Burke, K., & Zappen, J. P. (2006). On persuasion, identification, and dialectical symmetry. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 39(4), 333–339.
Camiciottoli, B. C., & Fortanet-Gómez, I. (Eds.). (2015). Multimodal analysis in academic settings: From research to teaching. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Caminos. (n.d.). Who are we? https://caminosoaxaca.wordpress.com/who-are-we/
Canagarajah, S. (2006). Toward a writing pedagogy of shuttling between languages: Learning from multilingual writers. College English, 68(6), 589.
Canagarajah, S. (2013). Translingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. Routledge.
Canagarajah, S. (2018). Translingual practice as spatial repertoires: Expanding the paradigm beyond structuralist orientations. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 31–54.
Carpenter, R. (2009). Boundary negotiations: Electronic environments as interface. Computers and Composition, 26(3), 138–148.
Carnegie, T. A. M. (2009). Interface as exordium: The rhetoric of interactivity. Computers and Composition, 26(3), 164–173.
Carter, M. (1990). The idea of expertise: An exploration of cognitive and social dimensions of writing. College Composition and Communication, 41(3), 265–286.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. Sage Publications.
Cisneros, J. D. (2014). The border crossed us: Rhetorics of borders, citizenship, and Latina/o identity. The University of Alabama Press.
Collins, H., & Evans, R. (2009). Rethinking expertise. University of Chicago Press.
Collins, H., & Evans, R. (2018). A sociological/philosophical perspective on expertise: The acquisition of expertise through socialization. In K. A. Ericsson, R. R. Hoffman, A. Kozbelt, & A. M. Williams (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (2nd ed., pp. 21–32). Cambridge University Press.
Conaster, T. (2015). Keeping track of DMAC: Visualizing influence across space and time. Computers and Composition Online.
Conference on College Composition and Communication. (2015). CCCC statement on preparing teachers of college writing.
Connal, L. R. (2004). Hybridity: A lens for understanding Mestizo/a writers. In A. A. Lunsford & L. Ouzgane (Eds.), Crossing borderlands: Composition and postcolonial studies (pp. 199–217). University of Pittsburgh Press.
Cook-Sather, A. (2003). Education as translation: Students transforming notions of narrative and self. CCC, 55(1), 91–114.
Cooper, M. M. (1986). The ecology of writing. College English, 48(4), 364–375.
Corbett, E. P. J., & Connors, R. J. (1999). Classical rhetoric for the modern student (4th ed). Oxford University Press.
Council of Writing Program Administrators (2014). WPA outcomes statement for first-year composition (v3.0).
Cox, M., Galin, J. R., & Melzer, D. (2018). Sustainable WAC: A whole systems approach to launching and developing Writing Across the Curriculum programs. National Council of Teachers of English.
Cozza, V. (2020). English 402: Technical and professional writing. Composition Studies, 48(3), 103–115.
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167.
Crowley, S. (1998). Composition in the university: Historical and polemical essays. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Cuellar, A. E. (2020). Mi testimonio: Crossing borders in the academy. In S. Madden, M. Eodice, K. T. Edwards, & A. Lockett (Eds.), Learning from the lived experiences of graduate student writers (pp. 132–136). Utah State University Press.
Cushman, E. (1998). The struggle and the tools: Oral and literate strategies in an inner city community. State University of New York Press.
de la Piedra, M. T., & Guerra, J. C. (2012). The literacy practices of transfronterizos in a multilingual world. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(6), 627–634.
Deans, T. (2000). Writing partnerships: Service-learning in composition. National Council of Teachers of English.
Deans, T. (2013). Sustainability deferred: The conflicting logics of career advancement and community engagement. In J. Restaino & L. Cella (Eds.), Unsustainable: Re-imagining community literacy, public writing, service-learning and the university (pp. 101–111). Lexington Books.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press.
Denecker, C., & Tulley, C. (2014). Introduction: The current moment in composition. The Writing Instructor.
DePalma, M.-J. (2015). Tracing transfer across media: Investigating writers’ perceptions of cross-contextual and rhetorical reshaping in processes of remediation. CCC, 66(4), 615–642.
Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L. S., Miller, K., Callaghan, K., & Kestin, G. (2019). Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(39), 19251–19257.
Dias, P., Freedman, A., Medway, P., & Paré, A. (Eds.). (1999). Worlds apart: Acting and writing in academic and workplace contexts. L. Erlbaum Associates.
Dolmage, J. (2008). Mapping composition: Inviting disability in the front door. In B. J. Brueggemann & C. Lewiecki-Wilson (Eds.), Disability and the teaching of writing: A critical sourcebook (pp. 14–27). Bedford/St. Martin’s.
Donahue, C. (2012). Transfer, portability, generalization: (How) does composition expertise “carry”? In K. Ritter & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), Exploring composition studies: Sites, issues, perspectives (pp. 145–166). Utah State University Press.
Dryer, D. B. (2012). At a mirror, darkly: The imagined undergraduate writers of ten novice composition instructors. CCC, 63(3), 420–452.
Dryer, D. B., Bowden, D., Brunk-Chavez, B., Harrington, S., Halbritter, B., & Yancey, K. B. (2014). Revising FYC outcomes for a multimodal, digitally composed world: The WPA Outcomes Statement for First-Year Composition. WPA: Writing Program Administration, 38(1), 129–143.
Duffelmeyer, B. B. (2003). Learning to learn: New TA preparation in computer pedagogy. Computers and Composition, 20(3), 295–311.
Dunning, D. (2011). The Dunning–Kruger Effect: On being ignorant of one’s own ignorance. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 44, pp. 247–296). Elsevier.
Durst, R. K. (1999). Collision course: Conflict, negotiation, and learning in college composition. National Council of Teachers of English.
Dysart, S., & Weckerle, C. (2015). Professional development in higher education: A model for meaningful technology integration. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 14, 255–265.
Elbow, P. (1985). The shifting relationships between speech and writing. CCC 36(3), 283-303.
Elon Statement on Writing Transfer. (2015). Retrieved from
http://www.centerforengagedlearning.org/elon-statement-on-writing-transfer/
Emory University. (2013, November 8). Transdisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, reductive disciplinarity, and deep disciplinarity [Video]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X31J9gm1KXM
Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Vähäaho, T. (1999). When the center does not hold: The importance of knotworking. In S. Chaiklin (Ed.), Activity theory and social practice: Cultural-historical approaches (pp. 345–374). Aarhus Univ. Press.
Eodice, M., Geller, A. E., & Lerner, N. (2016). The meaningful writing project: Learning, teaching, and writing in higher education. Utah State University Press.
Eyman, D. (2015). Digital rhetoric: Theory, method, practice. University of Michigan Press.
Fahnestock, J. (1999). Rhetorical figures in science. Oxford University Press.
Fahnestock, J. (2003). Verbal and visual parallelism. Written Communication, 20(2), 123–152.
Faris, M. J. (2019). Writing and technology in WPA: Toward the WPA as an advocate for technological writing. WPA: Writing Program Administration, 42(3), 106–112.
Fayol, M., Alamargot, D., & Berninger, V. W. (Eds.). (2012). Translation of thought to written text while composing: Advancing theory, knowledge, research methods, tools, and applications. Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis Group.
First-Year Writing Program. (2019). Instructor resource book, 2019-2020. https://fyw.uconn.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/570/2019/08/FYW_InstructorResourceBook_2019-2020.pdf
Fishman, R. S. (2008). The study of the wonderful: The first topographical mapping of vision in the brain. Archives of Ophthalmology, 126(12), 1767.
Fleckenstein, K. (2012). Reclaiming the mind: Eco-cognitive research in writing studies. In L. Nickoson & M. P. Sheridan (Eds.), Writing studies research in practice: Methods and methodologies (pp. 86–100). Southern Illinois University Press.
Fleckenstein, K., Spinuzzi, C., Rickly, R. J., & Clark, C. (2008). The importance of harmony: An ecological metaphor for writing research. CCC, 60(2), 388–419.
Flower, L. (2008). Community literacy and the rhetoric of public engagement. Southern Illinois University Press.
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. CCC, 32(4), 365–387.
Fodrey, C. M., & Mikovits, M. (2020). Theorizing WAC faculty development in multimodal project design. Across the Disciplines, 17(1–2), 42–58.
Fordham, T., & Oakes, H. (2013). Rhetoric across modes, rhetoric across campus: Faculty and students building a multimodal curriculum. In T. Bowen & C. Whithaus (Eds.), Multimodal literacies and emerging genres (pp. 313–336). University of Pittsburgh Press.
Fox, T. (1999). Defending access: A critique of standards in higher education. Boynton/Cook Publishers-Heinemann.
Fraiberg, S. (2010). Composition 2.0: Toward a Multilingual and Multimodal Framework. CCC, 62(1), 100–126.
Freadman, A. (1994). Anyone for Tennis? In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 37–58). Taylor & Francis.
Freadman, A. (2002). Uptake. In R. M. Coe, L. Lingard, & T. Teslenko (Eds.), The rhetoric and ideology of genre: Strategies for stability and change (pp. 39–53). Hampton Press.
Gee, J. P. (2015). The new literacy studies. In J. Rowsell & K. Pahl (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Literacy Studies (pp. 35–48). Routledge.
Geisler, C. (1994). Academic literacy and the nature of expertise: Reading, writing, and knowing in academic philosophy. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gentil, G. (2018). Modern languages, bilingual education, and translation studies: The next frontiers in WAC/WID research and instruction? Across the Disciplines, 15(3), 1–16.
Gere, A. R. (1994). Kitchen tables and rented rooms: The extracurriculum of composition. College Composition and Communication, 45(1), 75.
Gere, A. R. (2009). Initial report on survey of CCCC members. CCCC Squire Office of Policy Research.
Goldblatt, E. (2007). Because we live here: Sponsoring literacy beyond the college curriculum. Hampton Press, Inc.
Gonzales, L. (2017). But is that relevant here?: A pedagogical model for embedding translation training within technical communication courses in the US. Connexiones: International Professional Communication Journal, 5(1), 75–108.
Gonzales, L. (2018). Sites of translation: What multilinguals can teach us about digital writing and rhetoric. University of Michigan Press.
Gonzales, L., & Butler, J. (2020). Working toward social justice through multilingualism, multimodality, and accessibility in writing classrooms. Composition Forum, 44.
Gonzales, L., & Turner, H. N. (2017). Converging fields, expanding outcomes: Technical communication, translation, and design at a non-profit organization. Technical Communication, 64(2), 126–140.
Graban, T. S., Charlton, C., & Charlton, J. (2013). Multivalent Composition and the Reinvention of Expertise. In T. Bowen & C. Whithaus (Eds.), Multimodal literacies and emerging genres (pp. 248–281). University of Pittsburgh Press.
Grabill, J. T. (2007). Writing community change: Designing technologies for citizen action. Hampton Press.
Graupner, M., Nickoson-Massey, L., & Blair, K. (2009). Remediating knowledge-making spaces in the graduate curriculum: Developing and sustaining multimodal teaching and research. Computers and Composition, 26(1), 13–23.
Gries, L. E. (2015). Still life with rhetoric: A new materialist approach for visual rhetorics. Utah State University Press.
Gross, A. G., Harmon, J. E., & Reidy, M. S. (2002). Communicating science: The scientific article from the 17th century to the present. Parlor.
Grouling, J., & Grutsch McKinney, J. (2016). Taking stock: Multimodality in writing center users’ texts. Computers and Composition, 41, 56–67.
Grusin, R. (2015). Radical mediation. Critical Inquiry, 42(1), 124–148.
Guerra, J. C. (2004). Emerging representations, situated literacies, and the practice of transcultural repositioning. In M. H. Kells, V. M. Balester, & V. Villanueva (Eds.), Latino/a discourses: On language, identity & literacy education (pp. 7–23). Boynton/Cook Publishers/Heinemann.
Guerra, J. C. (2009). Putting literacy in its place: Nomadic consciousness and the practice of transcultural repositioning. In S. Miller (Ed.), The Norton book of composition studies (1st ed, pp. 1643–1653). W.W. Norton & Co.
Guerra, J. C. (2016). Language, culture, identity and citizenship in college classrooms and communities. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Haas, C. (1996). Writing technology: Studies on the materiality of literacy. L. Erlbaum Associates.
Hairston, M. (1985). Breaking our bonds and reaffirming our connections. College Composition and Communication, 36(3), 272–282.
Halasek, K. (1999). A pedagogy of possibility: Bakhtinian perspectives on composition studies. Southern Illinois University Press.
Hansen, K. (2018). Discipline and profession: Can the field of rhetoric and writing be both? In R. Malenczyk, S. K. Miller-Cochran, E. Wardle, & K. B. Yancey (Eds.), Composition, rhetoric, and disciplinarity. Utah State University Press.
Haraway, D. J. (1991). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature (pp. 149–182). Routledge.
Hariman, R. (2014). What is chiasmus?: Or, why the abyss stares back. In B. Wiseman & A. Paul (Eds.), Chiasmus and Culture (pp. 45–68). Berghahn Books.
Harris, J. (1989). The Idea of Community in the Study of Writing. College Composition and Communication, 40(1), 11.
Harris, J. (2020). The essay as form in a digital age. In P. R. Powell (Ed.), Writing changes: Alphabetic text and multimodal composition (pp. 123–137). The Modern Language Association of America.
Harris, J. (2012). A teaching subject: Composition since 1966 (New ed). Utah State University Press.
Hartelius, E. J. (2010). The rhetoric of expertise. Lexington Books.
Haswell, R. H. (2005). NCTE/CCCC’s recent war on scholarship. Written Communication, 22(2), 198–223.
Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. State University of New York Press.
Hauman, K., Kastner, S., & Witte, A. (2015). Writing teachers for twenty-first-century writers: A gap in graduate education. Pedagogy, 15(1), 45–57.
Hawkins, M. R. (2018). Transmodalities and transnational Encounters: fostering critical cosmopolitan relations. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 55–77.
Hayes, J. R. (2012). Evidence from language bursts, revision, and transcription for translation and its relation to other writing processes. In M. Fayol, D. Alamargot, & V. W. Berninger (Eds.), Translation of thought to written text while composing: Advancing theory, knowledge, research methods, tools, and applications (pp. 15–25). Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis Group.
Hesse, D. (2010). Response to Cynthia L Selfe’s “The movement of air, the breath of meaning: Aurality and multimodal composing.” CCC, 61(3), 602–605.
Hocks, M. E. (2001). Using multimedia to teach communication across the curriculum. WPA: Writing Program Administration, 25(1–2), 25–43.
hooks, b. (1990). Yearning: Race, gender, and cultural politics. South End Press.
Horner, B. (2016). Rewriting composition: Terms of exchange. Southern Illinois University Press.
Horner, B., Lu, M.-Z., Royster, J. J., & Trimbur, J. (2011). Language difference in writing: Toward a translingual approach. College English, 73(3), 303–321.
Horner, B., Selfe, C. L., & Lockridge, T. (2015). Translinguality, transmodality, and difference: Exploring dispositions, change in language, and learning. Enculturation Intermezzo.
Horner, B., & Tetreault, L. (2016). Translation as (global) writing. Composition Studies, 44(1), 13–30.
Howard, R. M. (1993). A plagiarism pentimento. Journal of Teaching Writing, 11(2), 233–246.
Howard, S. K. (2013). Risk-aversion: Understanding teachers’ resistance to technology integration. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22(3), 357–372.
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York University Press.
Jensen, K. B. (2016). Intermediality. In K. B. Jensen, E. W. Rothenbuhler, J. D. Pooley, & R. T. Craig (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy (1st ed., pp. 1–12).
Jiménez, R. T., David, S., Fagan, K., Risko, V. J., Pacheco, M., Pray, L., & Gonzales, M. (2015). Using translation to drive conceptual development for students becoming literate in English as an additional language. Research in the Teaching of English, 49(3), 248–271.
Johnson-Eilola, J., & Selber, S. A. (2007). Plagiarism, originality, assemblage. Computers and Composition, 24(4), 375–403.
Journet, D. (1997). Boundary rhetoric and disciplinary genres: Redrawing the maps in interdisciplinary writing. In W. Bishop & H. A. Ostrom (Eds.), Genre and writing: Issues, arguments, alternatives (pp. 56–66). Boynton/Cook-Heinemann.
Jung, J. (2005). Revisionary rhetoric, feminist pedagogy, and multigenre texts. Southern Illinois University Press.
Kahn, S. (2017). Anyone can teach writing. In C. E. Ball & D. M. Loewe (Eds.), Bad Ideas About Writing (pp. 363–368). Open Access Textbooks.
Kell, C. (2009). Literacy practices, text/s and meaning making across time and space. In M. Baynham & M. Prinsloo (Eds.), The future of literacy studies (pp. 75–99). Palgrave Macmillan.
Kell, C. (2011). Inequalities and crossings: Literacy and the spaces-in-between. International Journal of Educational Development, 31(6), 606–613.
Keller, C. J., & Weisser, C. R. (Eds.). (2007). The locations of composition. State University of New York Press.
Kellogg, R. T. (2018). Professional writing expertise. In K. A. Ericsson, R. R. Hoffman, A. Kozbelt, & A. M. Williams (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (2nd ed., pp. 413–430). Cambridge University Press.
Kells, M. H. (2007). Writing Across Communities: Diversity, deliberation, and the discursive possibilities. Reflections, 6(1), 87–108.
Kemp, F. (2005). Computers, innovation, and resistance in first-year composition programs. In Discord and direction: The postmodern writing program administrator (pp. 105–122). Utah State University Press.
Kerschbaum, S. L. (2014). Toward a new rhetoric of difference. Conference on College Composition and Communication, National Council of Teachers of English.
Kidd, D. (2014). The optic chiasm. Clinical Anatomy, 27(8), 1149–1158.
Kiernan, J., Meier, J., & Wang, X. (2016). Negotiating languages and cultures: Enacting translingualism through a translation assignment. Composition Studies, 44(1), 89–107.
Klein, J. T. (1996). Crossing boundaries: Knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities. University Press of Virginia.
Klein, J. T. (2009). The rhetoric of interdisciplinarity: Boundary work in the construction of new knowledge. In A. A. Lunsford, K. H. Wilson, & R. A. Eberly (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of rhetorical studies (pp. 265–283). SAGE.
Klein, P. D., & Leacock, T. L. (2012). Distributed cognition as a framework for understanding writing. In V. W. Berninger (Ed.), Past, present, and future contributions of cognitive writing research to cognitive psychology (pp. 133–152). Psychology Press.
Klem, E., & Moran, C. (1992). Teachers in a strange LANd: Learning to teach in a networked writing classroom. Computers and Composition, 9(3), 5–22.
Kress, G. (2005). Gains and losses: New forms of texts, knowledge, and learning. Computers and Composition, 22(1), 5–22.
Kretzmann, J. P., & McKnight, J. L. (1993). Building communities from the inside out: A path toward finding and mobilizing a community’s assets. Acta Publications.
Kryger, K., & Zimmerman, G. X. (2020). Neurodivergence and intersectionality in labor-based grading contracts. The Journal of Writing Assessment, 13(2).
Lang, H. (2019). Testimonio 3: Inhabiting the border. In I. Baca, Y. I. Hinojosa, & S. W. Murphy (Eds.), Bordered writers: Latinx identities and literacy practices at Hispanic-serving institutions (pp. 147–156). State University of New York Press.
Lanham, R. A. (1991). A handlist of rhetorical terms (2nd ed). University of California Press.
Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the social: An introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford Univ. Press.
Lauer, C. (2012). What’s in a name? The anatomy of defining new/multi/modal/digital/media texts. Kairos, 17(1).
Lauer, C., & Brumberger, E. (2019). Redefining writing for the responsive workplace. CCC, 70(4), 634–663.
Lauer, J. M. (1984). Composition studies: Dappled disciplines. Rhetoric Review, 3(1), 20–29.
Laurence, D. (2013). A profile of the non-tenure-track academic workforce. ADE Bulletin, 34(3), 6–22.
Leander, K. M., & Sheehy, M. (Eds.). (2004). Spatializing literacy research and practice. P. Lang.
Lee, R. (2018). Surveying the available modes of persuasion. In J. C. Lee & S. Khadka (Eds.), Designing and implementing multimodal curricula and programs (pp. 89–110). Routledge.
Lemke, J. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. R. Martin (Ed.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 87–114). Routledge.
Lettner-Rust, H. G., Tracy, P. J., Booker, S. L., Kocevar-Weidinger, E., & Burges, J. B. (2007). Writing beyond the curriculum: Transition, transfer, and transformation. Across the Disciplines, 4.
Lissner, P. A. (2007). Chi-thinking: Chiasmus and cognition (Publication No. 3297307) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland College Park]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Lu, M.-Z. (1994). Professing multiculturalism: The politics of style in the Contact Zone. CCC, 45(4), 442–458.
Lund, N. W. (1992). Chiasmus in the New Testament: A study in the form and function of chiastic structures. Hendrickson Publishers.
Lunsford, K. J., Logie, J., & Herrington, T. (2018). A copyleft manifesto. Kairos, 24(1).
Maimon, E. P. (1986). Collaborative learning and writing across the curriculum. WPA: Writing Program Administration, 9(3), 9–15.
Malenczyk, R., Miller-Cochran, S. K., Wardle, E., & Yancey, K. B. (Eds.). (2018). Composition, rhetoric, and disciplinarity. Utah State University Press.
Malinowitz, H. (1995). Textual orientations: Lesbian and gay students and the making of discourse communities. Boynton/Cook Publishers : Heinemann.
Mathieu, P. (2005). Tactics of hope: The public turn in English composition. Boynton/Cook Publishers.
Maybin, J. (2017). Textual trajectories: Theoretical roots and institutional consequences. Text & Talk, 37(4).
Mays, C., & McBride, M. (2020). Learning from interdisciplinary interactions: An argument for rhetorical deliberation as a framework for WID faculty. Composition Forum, 43.
McBee Orzulak, M. J. (2013). Gatekeepers and guides: Preparing future writing teachers to negotiate standard language ideology. Teaching/Writing: The Journal of Writing Teacher Education, 2(1), 12–21.
McCarthy, L. P. (1987). A stranger in strange lands: A college student writing across the curriculum. Research in the Teaching of English, 21(3), 233–265.
McCloud, S. (1993). Understanding comics. HarperPerennial.
McCorkle, B. (2012). Whose body?: Looking critically at new interface designs. In K. L. Arola & A. F. Wysocki (Eds.), Composing(media) = composing(embodiment): Bodies, technologies, writing, the teaching of writing (pp. 174–187). Utah State University Press.
McGrath, L., & Guglielmo, L. (2014). Supporting faculty in teaching the new work of composing: Colleague-guided faculty development within an English department. The Writing Instructor.
Medina, D. (2019). Writing the boundaries: Boundary-work in first-year composition. Composition Forum, 42.
Medway, P. (2002). Fuzzy genres and community identities: The case of architecture students’ sketchbooks. In R. M. Coe, L. Lingard, & T. Teslenko (Eds.), The rhetoric and ideology of genre: Strategies for stability and change (pp. 123–153). Hampton Press.
Melzer, D. (2014). Assignments across the curriculum: A national study of college writing. Utah State University Press.
Meyer, J., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to thinking and practising within the disciplines. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning theory and practice: 10 years on: Proceeding of the 2002 10th internationl symposium. The Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development, Oxford Brookes University.
Micciche, L. (2014). Writing material. College English, 76(6), 488–505.
Micciche, L. R., Rule, H. J., & Stratman, L. (2012). Multimodality, performance, and teacher-training. Computers and Composition Online.
Mikovits, M., Fodrey, C. M., & Yozell, E. (2021). Investigating the design of multimodal writing assignments across the disciplines. In S. B. Pandey & S. Khadka (Eds.), Multimodal composition: Faculty development programs and institutional change (pp. 277–291). Routledge.
Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(2), 151–167.
Miller, R. E. (1994). Fault lines in the contact zone. College English, 56(4), 389–408.
Miller, W. J. (2016). Origins of the dream: Hughes’s poetry and King’s rhetoric. University Press of Florida.
Mina, L. W. (2020). Technology professional development of writing faculty: The expectations and the needs. Composition Forum, 43.
Mina, L. W. (2019). Analyzing and theorizing writing teachers’ approaches to using new media technologies. Computers and Composition, 52, 1–16.
Minacori, P., & Veisblat, L. (2011). Translation and technical communication: Chicken or egg? Meta, 55(4), 752–768.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
MLA. (2014). MLA survey of departmental staffing, fall 2014.
Moore, J. L., Rosinski, P., Peeples, T., Pigg, S., Rife, M. C., Brunk-Chavez, B., Lackey, D., Rumsey, S. K., Tasaka, R., Curran, P., & Grabill, J. T. (2016). Revisualizing composition: How first-year writers use composing technologies. Computers and Composition, 39, 1–13.
Mueller, D. N. (2017). Network sense: Methods for visualizing a discipline. WAC Clearinghouse.
The New London Group. (1996). A Pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–93.
Nickoson, L. (2012). Revisiting teacher research. In L. Nickoson & M. P. Sheridan (Eds.), Writing studies research in practice: Methods and methodologies (pp. 101–112). Southern Illinois University Press.
Nystrand, M., Greene, S., & Wiemelt, J. (1993). Where did composition studies come from?: An intellectual history. Written Communication, 10(3), 267–333.
Oakey, D., & Russell, D. R. (2014). Beyond single domains: Writing in boundary crossing. In E.-M. Jakobs & D. Perrin (Eds.), Handbook of writing and text production (pp. 385–411). De Gruyter Mouton.
Obermark, L., Brewer, E., & Halasek, K. (2015). Moving from the one and done to a culture of collaboration: Revising professional development for TAs. WPA: Writing Program Administration, 39(1), 32–53.
Otis, H. N. (2019). Intersectional rhetoric: Where intersectionality as analytic sensibility and embodied rhetorical praxis converge. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 105(4), 369–389.
Overstreet, M. (2018). Writing at the interface: A research and teaching program for everyday digital media literacy. Literacy in Composition Studies, 8(1), 47–66.
Pahl, K. (2020). ‘Writing across’ as a mode of research. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 24, 100282.
Palmeri, J. (2012). Remixing composition: A history of multimodal writing pedagogy. Southern Illinois University Press.
Parks, S., & Goldblatt, E. (2000). Writing beyond the curriculum: Fostering new collaborations in literacy. College English, 62(5), 584.
Patterson, Gp., & Spencer, L. G. (2020). Toward trans rhetorical agency: A critical analysis of trans topics in rhetoric and composition and communication scholarship. Peitho, 22(4).
Paul, A. (2014). From stasis to ékstasis: Four types of chiasmus. In B. Wiseman & A. Paul (Eds.), Chiasmus and Culture (pp. 19–44). Berghahn Books.
Penrose, A. M. (2012). Professional identity in a contingent-labor profession: Expertise, autonomy, community in composition teaching. WPA: Writing Program Administration, 35(2), 108–126.
Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1992). Transfer of learning. In T. Husén & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The International encyclopedia of education (2nd ed). Pergamon ; Elsevier Science.
Poe, M., Lerner, N., & Craig, J. (2010). Learning to communicate in science and engineering case studies from MIT. MIT Press.
Popham, S. L. (2005). Forms as boundary genres in medicine, science, and business. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 19(3), 279–303.
Porter, J. (2003). Why technology matters to writing: A cyberwriter’s tale. Computers and Composition, 20(4), 375–394.
Powell, P. R. (2020). Introduction: Writing changes: Beyond the binary of writing versus multimodality. In P. R. Powell (Ed.), Writing changes: Alphabetic text and multimodal composition (pp. 1–20). The Modern Language Association of America.
Pratt, M. L. (1991). Arts of the contact zone. Profession, 1991, 33–40.
Prior, P. (2009). From speech genres to mediated multimodal genre systems: Bakhtin, Voloshinov, and the question of writing. In C. Bazerman, A. Bonini, & D. de C. Figueiredo (Eds.), Genre in a changing world (pp. 17–34). WAC Clearinghouse ; Parlor Press.
Prior, P., & Shipka, J. (2003). Chronotopic lamination: Tracing the contours of literate activity. In C. Bazerman & D. R. Russell (Eds.), Writing selves, writing societies: Research from activity perspectives (pp. 180–238). WAC Clearinghouse.
Prior, P., & Smith, A. (2020). Editorial: Writing across: Tracing transliteracies as becoming across time, space, and settings. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 24, 100246.
Rampton, B. (1999). Styling the Other: Introduction. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 3(4), 421–427.
Ratcliffe, K. (1999). Rhetorical listening: A trope for interpretive invention and a “code of cross-cultural conduct.” College Composition and Communication, 51(2), 195–224.
Raucci, J. (2021). A replication agenda for composition studies. CCC, 72(3), 440–461.
Rawson, K. J., & Williams, C. (2014). Transgender*: The rhetorical landscape of a term. Present Tense: A Journal of Rhetoric in Society, 3(2).
Reid, A. (2019). Composing with deliberate speed: Writing humanity’s future sensorium. In S. Sundvall (Ed.), Rhetorical speculations: The future of rhetoric, writing, and technology (pp. 69–87). Utah State University Press.
Reid, E. S., Estrem, H., & Belcheir, M. (2012). The effects of writing pedagogy education on graduate teaching assistants’ approaches to teaching composition. WPA: Writing Program Administration, 36(1), 32–73.
Reid, G. (2019). Compressing, expanding, and attending to scientific meaning: Writing the semiotic hybrid of science for professional and citizen scientists. Written Communication, 36(1), 68–98.
Reid, G., Snead, R., Pettiway, K., & Simoneaux, B. (2016). Multimodal communication in the university: Surveying faculty across disciplines. Across the Disciplines, 13(1).
Reiff, M. J., & Bawarshi, A. (2011). Tracing discursive resources: How students use prior genre knowledge to negotiate new writing contexts in first-year composition. Written Communication, 28(3), 312–337.
Reiss, D., Selfe, D., & Young, A. (Eds.). (1998). Electronic communication across the curriculum. National Council of Teachers of English.
Reynolds, N. (1993). Ethos as location: New sites for understanding discursive authority. Rhetoric Review, 11(2), 325–338.
Reynolds, N. (2007). Geographies of writing: Inhabiting places and encountering difference. Southern Illinois Univ. Press.
Ridolfo, J., & DeVoss, D. N. (2009). Composing for recomposition: Rhetorical velocity and delivery. Kairos, 13(2).
Rice, J. (2005). The new media instructor: Cultural capital and writing instruction. In S. I. Dobrin (Ed.), Don’t call it that: The composition practicum (pp. 266–283). National Council of Teachers of English.
Rice, J. (2007). The rhetoric of cool: Composition studies and new media. Southern Illinois University Press.
Rice, J. (2015). Para-expertise, tacit knowledge, and writing problems. College English, 78(2), 117–138.
Rice, R., & St. Amant, K. (Eds.). (2018). Thinking globally, composing locally: Rethinking online writing in the age of the global Internet. Utah State University Press.
Rodrigo, R., & Romberger, J. (2017). Managing digital technologies in writing programs: Writing program technologists and invisible service. Computers and Composition, 44, 67–82.
Roozen, K. (2020). Coming to act with tables: Tracing the laminated trajectories of an engineer-in-the-making. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 24, 100284.
Rose, M. (1989). Lives on the boundary: The struggles and achievements of America’s underprepared. Free Press ; Collier Macmillan.
Ross, D. G. (2017). The role of ethics, culture, and artistry in scientific illustration. Technical Communication Quarterly, 26(2), 145–172.
Rule, H. J. (2018). Writing’s Rooms. College Composition and Communication, 69(3), 402–432.
Rule, H. J. (2020). Beyond page design: Writing as multimodal embodied meaning. In P. R. Powell (Ed.), Writing changes: Alphabetic text and multimodal composition (pp. 62–82). The Modern Language Association of America.
Russell, D. R. (2002). Writing in the academic disciplines: A curricular history (2nd ed). Southern Illinois University Press.
Sabatino, L. A., & Blevins, B. (2018). Initiating multimodal training: Faculty development for creating and assessing assignments. In J. C. Lee & S. Khadka (Eds.), Designing and implementing multimodal curricula and programs (pp. 125–138). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd edition). SAGE.
Scarpa, F. (2019). An overview of the main issues of translation. In B. Maylath & K. St. Amant (Eds.), Translation and localization: A guide for technical and professional communicators (pp. 19–38). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Scenters-Zapico, J. (2010). Generaciones’ narratives: The pursuit andpractice of traditional and electronic literacies on the U.S.-Mexico borderlands. Utah State University.
Schor, S. (1986). Composition strategy as translation. College English, 48(2), 187–194.
Schroeder, C. L., Fox, H., & Bizzell, P. (Eds.). (2002). ALT DIS: Alternative discourses and the academy. Boynton/Cook–Heinemann.
Selber, S. A. (2004). Multiliteracies for a digital age. Southern Illinois University Press.
Selfe, C. L. (1999). Technology and literacy in the twenty-first century: The importance of paying attention. Southern Illinois University Press.
Selfe, C. L. (2004). Students who teach us: A case study of a new media text designer. In A. F. Wysocki (Ed.), Writing new media: Theory and applications for expanding the teaching of composition (pp. 43–66). Utah State University Press.
Selfe, C. L. (2009). The movement of air, the breath of meaning: Aurality and multimodal composing. CCC, 60(4), 616–663.
Selfe, C. L., & Selfe, R. J. (1994). The politics of the interface: power and its exercise in electronic Contact Zones. College Composition and Communication, 45(4), 480.
Sheppard, J. (2009). The rhetorical work of multimedia production practices: It’s more than just technical skill. Computers and Composition, 26(2), 122–131.
Sheridan, D. M., Ridolfo, J., & Michel, A. J. (2012). The available means of persuasion: Mapping a theory and pedagogy of multimodal public rhetoric. Parlor Press.
Shipka, J. (2007). This was (NOT) an easy assignment: Negotiating an activity-based framework for composing. Computers and Composition Online. http://cconlinejournal.org/not_easy/index.html
Shipka, J. (2009). Negotiating rhetorical, material, methodological, and technological difference: Evaluating multimodal designs. College Composition and Communication, 61(1), W343–W366.
Shipka, J. (2011). Toward a composition made whole. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Shipka, J. (2016). Transmodality in/and Processes of Making: Changing Dispositions and Practice. College English, 78(3), 250–257.
Shivers-McNair, A., Gonzales, L., & Zhyvotovska, T. (2019). An intersectional technofeminist framework for community-driven technology innovation. Computers and Composition, 51, 43–54.
Shor, I. (1997). Our Apartheid: Writing instruction and inequality. Journal of Basic Writing, 16(1), 91–104.
Smith, A. (2020). Across, through, and with: Ontological orientations for lifespan writing research. In R. J. Dippre & T. Phillips (Eds.), Approaches to lifespan writing research: Generating an actionable coherence (pp. 15–26). The WAC Clearinghouse ; University Press of Colorado.
Smith, A., & Prior, P. (2020). A Flat CHAT perspective on transliteracies development. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 24, 100268.
Smith, J. (1997). Students’ goals, gatekeeping, and some questions of ethics. College English, 59(3), 299–320.
Soliday, M. (2011). Everyday genres: Writing assignments across the disciplines. Southern Illinois University Press.
Somers, J. (2018, April). The scientific paper is obsolete: Here’s what’s next. The Atlantic, 135(17), 20–21.
Sousanis, N. (2015). Unflattening. Harvard University Press.
Spinuzzi, C. (2008). Network: Theorizing knowledge work in telecommunications. Cambridge University Press.
St. Amant, K. (2019). Introduction: The dynamics of—and need to understand—translation and localization in technical communication. In B. Maylath & K. St. Amant (Eds.), Translation and localization: A guide for technical and professional communicators (pp. 1–15). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, `translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.
Stornaiuolo, A., Smith, A., & Phillips, N. C. (2017). Developing a transliteracies framework for a connected world. Journal of Literacy Research, 49(1), 68–91.
Strecker, I. (2014). Chiasmus and metaphor. In B. Wiseman & A. Paul (Eds.), Chiasmus and Culture (pp. 69–88). Berghahn Books.
Sullivan, P. S. (2012). Experimental writing in composition: Aesthetics and pedagogies. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Summers, S., Szabo, J., & Ingram, E. L. (2018). Interdisciplinary faculty training experiences in multimodal composition. In J. C. Lee & S. Khadka (Eds.), Designing and implementing multimodal curricula and programs (pp. 139–154). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings (13. printing). Cambridge Univ. Press.
Swanson-Owens, D. (1986). Identifying natural sources of resistance: A case study of implementing Writing Across the Curriculum. Research in the Teaching of English, 20(1), 69–96.
Syverson, M. A. (1999). The wealth of reality: An ecology of composition. Southern Illinois University Press.
Takayoshi, P., & Brian, H. (2009). Composing in a digital world: The transition of a writing program and its faculty. WPA: Writing Program Administration, 32(3), 89–119.
Tardy, C. M. (2016). Beyond convention: Genre innovation in academic writing. University of Michigan Press ELT.
Thaiss, C. (2001). Theory in WAC: Where have we been, where are we going? In S. H. McLeod, E. Miraglia, M. Soven, & C. Thaiss (Eds.), WAC for the new millennium: Strategies for continuing writing-across-the-curriculum-programs (pp. 299–326). National Council of Teachers of English.
Thaiss, C. J., & Zawacki, T. M. (2006). Engaged writers and dynamic disciplines: Research on the academic writing life. Boynton/Cook.
Thomas, E. (2013). Chiasmus in art and text. Greece and Rome, 60(1), 50–88.
Treder, M. S. (2010). Behind the looking-glass: A review on human symmetry perception. Symmetry, 2(3), 1510–1543.
Tuomi-Gröhn, T., & Engeström, Y. (Eds.). (2003). Conceptualizing transfer: From standard notions to developmental perspectives. In Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing (1st ed, pp. 19–38). Pergamon.
Turner, H. N., & Gonzales, L. (2020). Visualizing translation. Kairos, 25(1).
Tyler, S. A. (1998). Them others: Voices without mirrors. Paideuma, 44(1998), 31–50.
Venuti, L. (2008). The translator’s invisibility: A history of translation (2nd ed). Routledge.
Villanueva, V. (2016). Metonymic borders and our sense of nation. In B. Couture & P. Wojahn (Eds.), Crossing borders, drawing boundaries: The rhetoric of lines across America (pp. 29–42). Utah State University Press.
Voloshinov, A. V. (1996). Symmetry as a superprinciple of science and art. Leonardo, 29(2), 109–113.
Voss, J. (2015). To teach, critique, and compose: Representing computers and composition through the CIWIC/DMAC Institute. Computers and Composition, 36, 16–31.
Wallace, D. L. (2011). Compelled to write: Alternative rhetoric in theory and practice. Utah State University Press.
Walsh, L. (2018). Visual invention and the composition of scientific research graphics: A topological approach. Written Communication, 35(1), 3–31.
Walters, S. (2014). Rhetorical touch: Disability, identification, haptics. The University of South Carolina Press.
Wang, X. (2020). Becoming multilingual writers through translation. Research in the Teaching of English, 54(3), 206–230.
Wardle, E. (2009). “Mutt genres” and the goal of FYC: Can we help students write the genres of the university? CCC, 60(4), 765–789.
Wardle, E. (2014). Considering what it means to teach “composition” in the twenty-first century. CCC, 65(4), 659–671.
Wardle, E., & Scott, J. B. (2015). Defining and developing expertise in a writing and rhetoric department. WPA: Writing Program Administration, 39(1), 72–93.
Watson, J. D., & Crick, F. H. C. (1953). Molecular structure of nucleic acids: A structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature, 171(4356), 737–738.
Weerts, D. J., & Sandmann, L. R. (2010). Community engagement and boundary-spanning roles at research universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(6), 632–657.
Whithaus, C. (2012). Claim-evidence structures in environmental science writing: Modifying Toulmin’s model to account for multimodal arguments. Technical Communication Quarterly, 21(2), 105–128.
Wickman, C. (2010). Writing material in chemical physics research: The laboratory notebook as locus of technical and textual integration. Written Communication, 27(3), 259–292.
Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (Expanded 2nd ed). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Wolfe, J. (2010). Team writing: A guide to working in groups. Bedford/St. Martin’s.
Woods, C. S. (2012). (Im)mobile metaphors: Toward an intersectional rhetorical history. In K. R. Chávez & C. L. Griffin (Eds.), Standing in the intersection: Feminist voices, feminist practices in communication studies (pp. 78–96). SUNY Press.
Wysocki, A. F., & Jasken, J. I. (2004). What should be an unforgettable face…. Computers and Composition, 21(1), 29–48.
Yancey, K. B. (2004). Made not only in words: Composition in a new key. CCC, 56(2), 297–328.
Yancey, K. B. (2009). Re-designing graduate education in composition and rhetoric: The use of remix as concept, material, and method. Computers and Composition, 26(1), 4–12.
Yancey, K. B. (2019). Expanding the inquiry: What everyday writing with drawing helps us understand about writing and about writing-based threshold concepts. In L. Adler-Kassner & E. Wardle (Eds.), (Re)considering what we know: Learning thresholds in writing, composition, rhetoric, and literacy (pp. 135–158). Utah State University Press.
Yancey, K. B., Robertson, L., & Taczak, K. (2014). Writing across contexts: Transfer, composition, and sites of writing. Utah State University Press.
Yep, G. A., Russo, S. E., & Allen, J. (2016). Pushing boundaries: Toward the development of a model for transing communication in (inter)cultural contexts. In L. G. Spencer & J. C. Capuzza (Eds.), Transgender communication studies: Histories, trends, and trajectories (pp. 69–92). Lexington Books.
Yergeau, M. R. (2018). Wandering rhetoric, rhetoric wandering. In R. Wysocki & M. P. Sheridan (Eds.), Making future matters. Computers and Composition Digital Press/Utah State University Press. https://ccdigitalpress.org/book/makingfuturematters/
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (Sixth edition). SAGE.
Young, D. D., & Morgan, R. (2020). The impact of critical community-engaged writing on student understanding of audience. Composition Studies, 48(3), 35–52.
Young, V. A. (2014). Other people’s English: Code-meshing, code-switching, and African American literacy. Teachers College Press/Teachers College/Columbia University.
© Gabriel Morrison, 2021
